I hate to bring up such an old thread, but I thought it better to bring this one up rather than starting a new one and referring to this thread.
Okay, as anyone can read (or remember), in 2004 I was rear-ended and I had a terrible time dealing with the shop. My car was not painted the right color, the gas door gave problems, and a host of other issues. I remember thinking, at least the repair work was all right. Boy was I wrong.
Last night I began tearing down the interior of my trunk. I was removing all the panels, etc to the installation of my new suspension go faster on Saturday. Well, when I removed all the body panels I found:
(1) The welds that were done on my vehicle were separating
(2) That there was huge amount of rust all underneath the paint of my vehicle
(3) That the frame of rear (that piece of metal underneath the rear lights that goes all the way across) is completely rusted from the inside.
(4) That the paint right above the rear lights is chipping because the weld separated and it is completely rusted
I was horrified and disgusted. I stopped the tear down. I don't know whether to do the install anymore or not.
Here's what I have done (And anyone with pointers or suggestion on how to handle this, PLEASE chime in):
(1) Spoke with the repair shop who did the repairs; he told me, make an appointment, bring the car in, let him see if there is a workmanship claim, and then 'we'll discuss it;' he also said that it has a 5 year / 50,000 mile warranty of the work performed.
(2) I do not trust this man. I believe he will try and feed me some cock and bull story of how it has nothing to do with his work and that the rust is normal for a 12 year old car. But he tore down, sanded, primed and painted the entire back side of the car, so rust like that and welds separating is (or least shouldn't be) not expected. Given that I expect this nonsense to spill out of his mouth, I called my insurance company and informed them of the situation and asked them if I can take it to their adjuster, along with his work order (list of the work he performed on my vehicle) and get an estimate of cost of repair and whether he believes it is workmanship related. The person I spoke with also told me that he is referring me to an adjuster who has alot of experience, especially with BMW/MErcedes and will also give me the names of 5 repair shops that can offer me an opinion as to cost and whether the damage is poor workmanship.
After I receive several letters in writing from independent sources as to the cause being poor workmanship, I am then going to Jeff Scholtz of Car Collision Carstar of Baltimore and see what he says. If he admits and fixes, no problems. If not, I'm planning on leaving a copy of all the statements I will gather that state it is poor workmanship and giving him one chance to change his mind before taking him to court on a breach of warranty claim.
Dan, or anyone else, do you know when the Statute of Limitations runs on a warranty claim? I know the SOL is 3 years on most K disputes in MD, but I don't know when it starts running for warranty claims. I would imagine that so long as I am under warranty, I won't run into a SOL problem if it goes to court, but I want to make sure. I received the warranty in August of 2004, so I'll have to move fast if that is the case.
Any thoughts, additional suggestions, comments? Please. The more minds, the better!