Turbo for 325i?

mikev

Active Member
Messages
653
Likes
0
Location
Bournemouth, England (but still at my desk)
#21
Re: Turbo!

beemerworld said:
Yes the 94/95 are much better. I use to have a 1994 325i and we measured the 0-60 time and it was 5.94s. That was with Dinan chip and some air filter upgrade. everything else stock.
im sorry but theres no way that can be true with just those upgrades. Your running the same power as the 328is in europe and my car gives them a run for there money!!
 
Messages
343
Likes
0
Location
st. petersburg, FL
#22
i used to own a 92 325i and no matter what i did to it (chip, intake, exhaust), i couldn't get teh 0-60 time under 8 secs. that model really does have an incredibly slow start. (talking from experience here...). i totalled it a year ago oct. 3rd and purchased a 96 328i for 12k. let me tell you something about difference in overall performance...!!! it was night and day. this car did 0-60 in like 7.8 secs i believe and it's auto. now since my aa intake, aa exhaust, and conforti chip i've gotten time of 7 secs and less. once again, it's an auto!!! so if you're looking for the best bang for your buck, get a manual 328. sure if you have 17k you should go with a really used m3, but i say get teh 328. you'll be utterly speechless!!! (once again, talking from experience) comrade1 recently got a 328 after he traded in his 318 and was literally ecstatic!!

by the way,... those 325i #'s are impossible. time is best measured on the road if you asked me. don't all those magazines test their vehicles on the road? if not, i wouldn't believe any of their articles when they talk about how well a vehicle performs if all their tests were done inside.
 


Top